Author Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1908 Excerpt:...The appeal is dismissed and the assessment will remain as equalized by appellee. $1,500 8,500 No. 68, Luther H. Perkins, Appellant, vs. The County Board, etc., of Montgomery County, Appellee. The weight of evidence in this appeal is clearly on the side of appellee. It is therefore ordered by the Board that the appeal be dismissed and that the assessment against the property in question be and remain fixed at the amounts for the respective pieces of property, as equalized by appellee. No. 69. William Breit, Katy Geisler, M. V. Perkins, Appellants, vs. The County Board, etc., of Montgomery County, Appellee. The weight of the evidence in these three appeals is unquestionably on the side of the appellee. It is therefore ordered by the Board that the appeals be dismissed, and that the assessments against the property in question stand at the amounts fixed by appellee for the respective pieces of property. No. 5. John Campbell, Appellant, vs. The County Board, etc., of Jefferson County, Appellee. An examination of the contract of sale involved in this appeal leads the Board to the conclusion that the contract, by reason of its terms, is properly taxable as personal property under the law of the state, and it is therefore Ordered, That the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed; and ordered further, that the assessed value of the contract in question shall remain and be fixed at the amount as equalized by appellee. No. 6. W. H. Vanatta, Appellant, vs. The County Board, etc., of Jefferson County, Appellee, An examination of the contract of sale involved in this appeal leads the Board to the conclusion that the contract, by reason of its terms, is properly taxable as personal property under the law of the state, and it is therefore Ordered, That the appeal be an...