Author Description

In the first volume of HOMOSEXUALITY - The Lives of the Fabulous Men Who Preferred Men - Ancient Greece I stated that I had been doing research for years on Greeks, Romans and Florentines, but that the recent law passed in my home country, France, allowing men to marry men, acted as a catalyst to put my notes into publishable form. This second volume, directed at valiant and worthy Romans who preferred, sexually, men and boys, will be more difficult because Roman lives described as valiant and worthy are not nearly as clear-cut as were those of the Greeks, Greeks who courageously fought at Marathon and the Thermopylae, who defeated the Persians, an immense victory of vital importance to us today. The paradox in Rome was this: On the one hand we had Caesar who never lived down his vile reputation as having been the beloved of King Nicomedes of Bithynia, while on the other hand, the Bithynian boy Antinous was imposed on Rome by Emperor Hadrian. Soldiers didn't refrain from mocking Caesar, often right outside his tent, but their ribbing was always good-natured and Caesar's reputation never really suffered. In fact, the soldiers respected and perhaps even loved the man. Yet for the everyday Roman there was no paradox of any form. When he was horny and wanted sex, he turned to what was closest at hand, be it a boy or a girl. It had been a rough haul from the simple beauty of Greek love to virile Roman barbarism, where Caesar alone may have been directly responsible for 1,200,000 deaths, youths who certainly had their whole lives before them, and Sulla lectured senators while on the Circus Maximus below 9,000 lads were screaming for pity while their throats were being slit. A bumpy road from the simple purity of Achilles and Patroclus, Alexander and Hephaestion, Apollo and Hyacinth. If we put aside painted Roman faces and plucked buttocks hairs, if we discount a stark naked emperor stalking well-endowed sailors, kings castrating catamites by the hundreds, slaves bought wi