Author Description

Organizational communication challenge Risk communication is the term of act used for situation when people need good information to make around choices. It is distinguished from public affairs or public relations communication by its commitment to accuracy. In any organizations, unclear communication will insult to injury for staffs who have been hurt because who were inadequately informed. Risk communications must deal with the benefits that risk decisions can produce ( e.g. profits from investments, better health from medical procedures), as well as the risks of results from many contributing disciplines (e.g. psychology, decision science, sociology, communications). So, organizational departments cause difficult communication process will cause staffs feel in isolation, leaving gaps as to how research results apply to complex, real-world working situations. The organizational difficult communication will focus on three questions: What does the science say about that aspect of human (staffs) behavior, when who feel difficult communication in organization? What rare the practical implications of those scientific result? How can one evaluate communications based on that psychological science? These questions assume that sound communications must be evidence based in two related ways. One is that communications should be consistent with the psychological science and not do things known not to work nor ignore known problems. The second is communications should be evaluated because even the base psychological science can't guarantee results. Rather, the best psychological science produces the best informed and the best guesses about how well communications will work. In any organizations, every staff individual is similar to the audience, e.g. how the staff interprets quantitative information communicates to another staff audience, how emotions and age affects risk perceptions, others with communications. e.g. decision aids, mass media, What is organizational risk mes