Author Description

Today, Every Continent Retains Elements Of The Legal Code Distributed By The British Empire. The British Empire Created A Legal Footprint Along With Political, Economic, Cultural And Racial Ones. One Of The Central Problems Of Political Theory Is The Insurmountable Gap Between Ideas And Their Realization. Keally Mcbride Argues That Understanding The Presently Fraught State Of The Concept Of The Rule Of Law Around The Globe Relies Upon Understanding How It Was First Introduced And Then Practiced Through Colonial Administration--as Well As Unraveling The Ideas And Practices Of Those Who Instituted It. The Astonishing Fact Of The Matter Is That For Thirty Years, Between 1814 And 1844, Virtually All Of The Laws In The British Empire Were Reviewed, Approved Or Discarded By One Individual: James Stephen, Disparagingly Known As Mr. Mothercountry. Virtually Every Single Act That Was Passed By A Colony Made Its Way To His Desk, From A Levy To Improve Sanitation, To An Officer's Pay, To Laws Around Migration And Immigration, And Tariffs On Products. Stephen, Great-grandfather Of Virginia Woolf, Was An Ardent Abolitionist, And He Saw His Role As A Legal Protector Of The Most Dispossessed. When Confronted By Acts That Could Not Be Overturned By Reference To British Law That He Found Objectionable, He Would Make Arguments In The Name Of The Natural Law Of Justice And Equity. He Truly Believed That Law Could Be A Force For Good And Equity At The Same Time That He Was Frustrated By The Existence Of Laws That He Saw As Abhorrent. In Mr. Mothercountry, Mcbride Draws On Original Archival Research Of The Writings Of Stephen And His Descendants, As Well As The Macaulay Family, Two Major Lineages Of Legal Administrators In The British Colonies, To Explore The Gap Between The Ideal Of The Rule Of Law And The Ways In Which It Was Practiced And Enforced. Mcbride Does This To Show That There Is No Way Of Claiming That Law Is Always A Force For Good Or Simply An Ideological Cover For Oppression.