
Hilary of Poitiers (c300-368), Bishop and Theologian, was instrumental in shaping the development of pro-Nicene theology in the West. Carl Beckwith engages the extensive scholarship on the fourth-century Trinitarian debates and brings new light on the structure and chronology of Hilary's monumental De Trinitate. There is a broad scholarly consensus that Hilary combined two separate theological works, a treatise on faith (De Fide) and a treatise against the 'Arians' (Adversus Arianos), to create De Trinitate. In spite of this the question of when and why Hilary performed this task has largely remained unanswered. Beckwith addresses this puzzle, situating Hilary's De Trinitate in its historical and theological context and offering a close reading of his text. He demonstrates that Hilary made significant revisions to the early books of his treatise; revisions that he attempted to conceal from his readers in order to give the impression of a unified work on the Trinity. Beckwith argues that De Fide was written in 356 following Hilary's condemnation at the synod of Béziers and prior to receiving a decision on his exile from the Emperor. When Hilary arrived in exile, he wrote a second work, Adversus Arianos. Following the synod of Sirmium in 357 and his collaboration with Basil of Ancyra in early 358, Hilary recast his efforts and began to write De Trinitate. He decided to incorporate his two earlier works, De Fide and Adversus Arianos, into this project. Toward that end, he returned to his earlier works and drastically revised their content by adding new prefaces and new theological and exegetical material to reflect his mature pro-Nicene theology. Beckwith provides a compelling case for the nature of these radical revisions, crucial textual alterations that have never before been acknowledged in the scholarship on De Trinitate.
This study investigates the chronological and structural origins of Hilary of Poitiers' monumental work, De Trinitate, to determine why and when the author synthesized his earlier theological treatises. Carl L. Beckwith, a scholar of early Christian history, utilizes a rigorous textual analysis of Hilary's writings to challenge the established understanding of the work's composition. By examining the historical context of the fourth-century Trinitarian debates, Beckwith argues that Hilary intentionally revised and integrated his earlier works, De Fide and Adversus Arianos, to present a unified theological argument while concealing the original fragmented nature of the texts.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars in the field of patristics recognize this work as a significant contribution to the understanding of Hilary's editorial methodology and his role in pro-Nicene theology. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for specialists in early Christian studies and historical theology.
Page Count:
240
Publication Date:
2008-01-01
Publisher:
OUP Oxford
ISBN-10:
0191564303
ISBN-13:
9780191564307
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!