This work investigates the core question of whether David Hume's moral and political theories can be understood as a precursor to modern social science rather than traditional normative philosophy. Russell Hardin, a political scientist, utilizes Hume's own writings to argue that normative views are psychological phenomena rather than objective truths. He positions Hume as a strategic thinker whose work on convention and sympathy anticipates the development of utilitarianism and modern social science, specifically linking his ideas to those of Adam Smith.

Scholars and students of political philosophy frequently note that Hardin provides a clear, modern interpretation of Hume that bridges the gap between historical philosophy and contemporary social science. Experts highlight this text as a useful resource for those interested in the strategic and utilitarian elements of Hume's political thought.