Author Description

So, what can we say about the psyche? Scientifically speaking, only this what can be observed. Of course, as the example of Copernicus shows, observation itself is not a guarantee that what we see is what we see. But in the case of the psyche it is just the reverse of the case of Copernicus. Because the observation of so far sees nothing! Untill cosmic trips scientific procedure based on the observation, which is the condition sine qua non of the true science, could not accept the calculations of Copernicus. Even if mathematically speaking they looked correct and plausible. In other words Copernicus, 400 years before the observation made from the point of view of the cosmic space, gave mathematical arguments that the observation made from the point of view of the Earth surface was wrong.My role in the history of the psyche exploration is the reverse of the role played by Copernicus in the cosmos exploration. Namely, Copernicus with mathematical arguments proved that the description of the observation of the Sun movement on the sky was only a guise of the truth. And the mistake of that false observation consisted in a wrong point of view of the observation of the Sun movement. I, in turn, with my logics, biology, physics, chemistry and evolutionary arguments try to prove that the description of the psyche in force based on no observation is also only a guise of the truth. A guise which is the same invented as it was before Copernicus. One thing jumps however to the eyes. People 2000, 1000 and 400 years ago seemed to be better thinkers than people today! Why? These ancient people, even if wrong in their description of the Sun movement, are excused by the argument of the observation in their favor. People of the XX century, in turn, believe in a description of the psyche based on the argument of no observation...My role in this turning point of the psyche exploration is to stop the era of descriptions of the psyche based on no observation. In order to make this observa