
This is a study of the most paradoxical aspect of modernism, its obsession with the past. Eliot wrote that the artist must be conscious "not only of the pastness of the past, but of its presence." This creed permeated the movement: Modernists believed that the energies of the past could be resurrected in modern works, and that they could be the very force that makes those works modern: the urge of Pound and others to "make it new" stemmed from seeing the past as a source of renewal. Schneidau focuses on separate texts that incorporate these concepts: Joyce's Ulysses, Hardy's poems, Forster's Howards End, Conrad's Secret Agent, Sherwood Anderson's Winesburg, Ohio, and finally Pound's Cantos. In his discussions, many little-noticed connections are examined, including a transatlantic set: Hardy with Pound, Forster with Fitzgerald, Joyce and Lawrence with Anderson.
This study investigates the paradoxical reliance of Modernist literature on the historical past as a primary engine for artistic innovation and renewal. Herbert N. Schneidau, an established scholar in literary studies, examines how the movement's central figures sought to reconcile the weight of tradition with the imperative to create something entirely new. By analyzing the works of major twentieth-century authors, he argues that the 'presence' of the past was not a regressive impulse but a vital, generative force that defined the Modernist aesthetic.
What You Will Find
Scholars and students of Modernist literature frequently cite this work for its nuanced exploration of the movement's relationship with tradition. Readers often note the academic density of the prose, which provides a rigorous intellectual foundation for understanding the complex interplay between history and innovation in early twentieth-century writing.
Page Count:
304
Publication Date:
1991-08-15
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0195068629
ISBN-13:
9780195068627
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!