
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The central idea behind this book is that we lack consensus on principles for allocating medical resources -- and in the absence of such a consensus we must develop and rely on a fair decision-making process for setting limits on health care. Daniels and Sabin provide a cogent analysis of the current situation, lucidly review the usual candidate solutions, and describe their own approach. The audience for the book is global since the problem of limited resources cuts across types of health care systems whether or not they have universal coverage.In its first edition the book stimulated considerable work on setting priorities in health care, both here and abroad. The revision adds new material to the book, including several chapters on new international research data from Mexico and Canada.
How can health care systems establish legitimate and fair processes for allocating limited medical resources when societal consensus on specific priorities remains elusive? Authors James E. Sabin and Norman Daniels, both experts in medical ethics and health policy, argue that because universal agreement on rationing is unlikely, institutions must adopt a transparent, accountable decision-making framework. They synthesize philosophical principles with practical administrative strategies to provide a roadmap for health care organizations navigating the tension between rising costs and finite budgets.
What You Will Find
Experts recognize this work as a foundational text for health policy administrators and bioethicists concerned with institutional equity. Readers frequently note the clarity of the authors' procedural approach, which remains highly relevant for navigating the complexities of modern health care management.
Page Count:
280
Publication Date:
2008-02-22
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0195325958
ISBN-13:
9780195325959
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!