
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Both English and American law provide a measure of discovery for civil cases. In this book, the author brings to bear empirical evidence and legal theory in a critical comparison of English and American discovery, and analyzes and evaluates the differences between the two systems. With the goal that legal systems should operate as justly, speedily, and inexpensively as possible, the book guages whether the present English and American discovery law goes too far or not far enough, and proposes reforms for both countries. It also offers assistance to practitioners of discovery. For example, the book shows how requests for admissions can be used innovatively, especially when interrogatories are not available, how a party whose property is being inspected should participate in the inspection, and how discovery can be employed to narrow the issues for trial.
This book investigates whether current English and American civil discovery laws effectively balance the need for justice with the requirements of speed and cost-efficiency. Julius Byron Levine utilizes a combination of empirical evidence and established legal theory to conduct a rigorous comparative analysis of the two distinct discovery systems. By evaluating the procedural differences between the jurisdictions, the author identifies systemic inefficiencies and provides actionable reform proposals intended to optimize litigation outcomes for both countries.
What You Will Find
Legal practitioners and scholars frequently cite this work as a significant resource for understanding the procedural nuances of civil discovery. Experts highlight the text as a practical manual that bridges the gap between theoretical legal reform and the day-to-day requirements of trial preparation.
Page Count:
248
Publication Date:
1982-04-22
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0198253680
ISBN-13:
9780198253686
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!