
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Transportation's (DOT) management and oversight of university research activities, focusing on: (1) all awards made by DOT and its operating administrations for fiscal years (FY) 1991 through 1993, particularly university awards for which Congress earmarked DOT funds; (2) how DOT and its operating administrations plan and track university research activities; and (3) how DOT oversees the financial aspects of university research awards. GAO found that: (1) during FY 1991 through 1993, 141 universities received 608 awards from DOT totalling $190 million; (2) 63 percent of the awards included overhead costs that totalled 20 percent of the total funds; (3) Congress earmarked $178 million in DOT funds to 46 universities or related facilities, of which DOT had obligated $110 million as of September 30, 1993; (4) DOT investment in university research activities has increased 470 percent from FY 1988 through 1993; (5) DOT cannot ensure that its research contracts contribute to advancing technology or that it does not fund duplicative and unnecessary research, since its planning for research activities is diverse and fragmented; (6) although DOT has several systems to track award spending, the systems do not provide complete and accurate information on the total number or purpose of university research awards; (7) as recommended by the National Performance Review, DOT is developing an integrated national transportation research and development plan; (8) DOT is considering developing a centralized database to track its university research projects; and (9) DOT has provided limited financial oversight of its university awards, which has resulted in inadequate management control of the award process, overcharges and questionable costs, and grantees' noncompliance with cost-sharing arrangements.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigated the Department of Transportation's (DOT) oversight of university research activities following a congressional request. The review focused on DOT's management of research awards from fiscal years 1991 through 1993, particularly those with congressional earmarks, and examined how DOT plans, tracks, and financially oversees these university research projects. The GAO found that while universities received significant funding, DOT's fragmented planning and tracking systems hindered its ability to ensure technological advancement or prevent duplicative research, and limited financial oversight led to issues like overcharges and noncompliance.
The GAO's report highlights significant deficiencies in the Department of Transportation's oversight of university research. The findings indicate that fragmented planning and insufficient financial controls have led to potential waste, overcharges, and a lack of assurance regarding the advancement of technology or the avoidance of duplicative efforts. The report suggests that while DOT is taking steps to improve its research planning and tracking, the existing systems require substantial enhancement to ensure effective management and accountability of its substantial investments in university research.
Page Count:
54
Publication Date:
2013-06-01
Publisher:
BiblioLife
ISBN-10:
1289037434
ISBN-13:
9781289037437
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!