The central conflict arises from the protagonist's self-proclaimed status as the greatest living American writer and his attempt to solidify this legacy through a definitive, yet entirely fabricated, anthology. Neal Pollack serves as both the narrator and the subject, navigating a world of literary pretension and absurd social commentary. His objective is to document his own supposed achievements and historical impact, while the primary force opposing him is the inherent absurdity of his own ego and the skepticism of the literary establishment. The narrative framework is a satirical collection of essays that blurs the line between autobiography and performance art, utilizing a mock-serious tone to critique contemporary culture. The world is defined by its hyper-inflated sense of self-importance and the logical constraints of a reality where the author's claims are blatantly impossible.

Readers and critics frequently describe this work as a sharp exercise in postmodern satire that relies heavily on the author's persona. Discussion often centers on the effectiveness of the mock-biographical elements and how they challenge the reader's perception of truth in literature. Many highlight the balance between the author's comedic timing and his critique of the literary industry's self-seriousness. The pacing is noted for its rapid shifts in tone, which keeps the reader engaged with the absurdity of the premise. Overall, the work is viewed as a commentary on the cult of personality within the American literary landscape.