Author Description

This Paper Aims At Contributing To A Reflection About The Legacy Of Harold Garfinkel And The Relations Between Ethnomethodology (em) And Conversation Analysis (ca), By Focusing On A Common Concern For Both Programs: The Study Of Action As Methodic (the Term Is Used Here In Line With The Sense Of Ethnomethodology), I.e. Ordered, Accountable, Recognizable, And Reproducible. Both Approaches Seek To Describe The Members' (term Favored In Ethnomethodology) Or Coparticipants' (term Favored In Conversation Analysis) Production, Recognition, And Reproduction Of Actions Understood As Locally Situated Social Achievements. Within This Framework, The Chapter Discusses Two Key Dimensions Of Methodically Produced Actions - Their Situatedness And Orderliness - And Attempts To Show The Importance Of Considering Both Of Them Together. This Discussion Is Developed In Relation To A More Recent Trend In Ethnomethodology And Conversation Analysis, Based On The Use Of Video Materials Documenting Naturally Occurring Social Interactions, Permitting The Fine-grained Scrutinity Of The Multimodal Details Of Action. Multimodal Analysis Generates New Insights Into Both The Situated And The Ordered Dimensions Of The Organization Of Social Action--