
Many Of The Current Debates About Validity In Psychiatry And Psychology Are Predicated On The Unexpected Failure To Validate Commonly Used Diagnostic Categories. The Recognition Of This Failure Has Resulted In, What Thomas Kuhn Calls, A Period Of Extraordinary Science In Which Validation Problems Are Given Increased Weight, Alternatives Are Proposed, Methodologies Are Debated, And Philosophical And Historical Analyses Are Seen As More Relevant Than Usual. In This Important New Book In The Ippp Series, A Group Of Leading Thinkers In Psychiatry, Psychology, And Philosophy Offer Alternative Perspectives That Address Both The Scientific And Clinical Aspects Of Psychiatric Validation, Emphasizing Throughout Their Philosophical And Historical Considerations. This Is A Book That All Psychiatrists, As Well As Philosophers With An Interest In Psychiatry, Will Find Thought Provoking And Valuable.
This volume investigates the ongoing crisis of diagnostic validity in psychiatry and psychology, questioning why established categories frequently fail to meet rigorous scientific standards. The authors, a multidisciplinary group of experts in psychiatry and philosophy, utilize Thomas Kuhn’s framework of 'extraordinary science' to analyze why current diagnostic models are faltering. They argue that resolving these validation issues requires moving beyond purely empirical data to incorporate historical and philosophical inquiry into the clinical process.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts recognize this text as a significant contribution to the philosophy of psychiatry, particularly for those examining the theoretical foundations of mental health diagnostics. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for professionals and scholars engaged in high-level clinical and philosophical discourse.
Page Count:
288
Publication Date:
2014-01-01
Publisher:
Oup Oxford
ISBN-10:
0191502030
ISBN-13:
9780191502033
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!