
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Post-national Law Stands On Ambivalent Foundations. This Is A Virtue Worth Preserving. When Hannah Arendt Reflected In 1954 On The Future Of Europe-and The Prospects For Its Unification In The Aftermath Of The Second World War-she Feared Not Only The Failure Of The Then-nascent European Project But Also Its Possible Success. In The Service Of Dissolving The Nation-state System, Europe Might Be Tempted To Create An 'other' Against Which It Would Define Its Identity. This, Arendt Believed, Would Betray Europe's Responsibility To Understand Its Recent Catastrophe And To Inaugurate Emancipatory Political And Constitutional Forms Of Life In Its Wake. The Result Would Be A False Political Closure, An Exclusionary Nationalism In New Guise.
This book investigates the inherent tensions and potential dangers of post-national constitutionalism, specifically within the context of the European project. Paul Linden-Retek, a scholar of law and political theory, examines the historical and philosophical foundations of European integration through the lens of Hannah Arendt’s political thought. He argues that the pursuit of a unified European identity risks replicating the exclusionary mechanisms of the nation-state system it seeks to transcend, ultimately advocating for an ambivalent, open-ended approach to constitutional development that avoids premature political closure.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars in the fields of legal theory and European studies identify this work as a significant contribution to the critique of post-national governance. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which requires a strong background in political philosophy to fully grasp the author's nuanced arguments.
Page Count:
0
Publication Date:
2023-01-01
ISBN-10:
0191983527
ISBN-13:
9780191983528
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!