
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
"Legitimation by Constitution" is the phrase, coined by distinguished authors Frank Michelman and Alessandro Ferrara, for a key idea in Rawlsian political liberalism of a reliance on a dualist form of democracy-a subjection of ground-level lawmaking to the constraints of a higher-law constitution that most citizens could find acceptable as a framework for their politics-as a response to the problem of maintaining a liberally just, stable, and oppression-free democratic government in conditions of pluralist visionary conflict. Legitimation by Constitution recalls, collects, and combines a series of exchanges over the years between Michelman and Ferrara, inspired by Rawls' encapsulation of this conception in his proposed liberal principle of legitimacy. From a shared standpoint of sympathetic identification with the political-liberal statement of the problem, for which legitimation by constitution is proposed as a solution, these exchanges consider the perceived difficulties arguably standing in the way of this proposal's fulfillment on terms consistent with political liberalism's defining ideas about political justification. The authors discuss the mysteries of a democratic constituent power; the tensions between government-by-the-people and government-by-consent; the challenges posed to concretization by judicial authorities of national constitutional law; and the magnification of these tensions and challenges under the lenses of ambition towards transnational legal ordering. These discussions engage with other leading contemporary theorists of liberal-democratic constitutionalism including Bruce Ackerman, Ronald Dworkin, and Jürgen Habermas.
This work investigates how a dualist form of democracy, characterized by the subjection of ordinary lawmaking to a higher-law constitution, can provide a stable and legitimate framework for governance within pluralistic societies. Alessandro Ferrara and Frank I. Michelman, both established scholars in political and legal theory, utilize the Rawlsian principle of legitimacy to examine the tensions between democratic constituent power and the requirements of political justification. The authors present a series of dialogues that analyze the feasibility of constitutionalism as a solution to the challenges of maintaining a just government amidst conflicting societal visions.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts identify this text as a sophisticated contribution to contemporary constitutional theory that bridges the gap between political philosophy and legal practice. Readers frequently note the high level of academic density and the rigorous, dialectical nature of the prose which requires a strong background in political theory to fully navigate.
Page Count:
200
Publication Date:
2021-01-01
Publisher:
OUP Oxford
ISBN-10:
019266722X
ISBN-13:
9780192667229
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!