Author Description

In Attributing Knowledge, Jody Azzouni Challenges Philosophical Conventions About What It Means To Know Something. He Argues That The Restrictive Conditions Philosophers Place On Knowers Only Hold In Special Cases; Knowledge Can Be Attributed To Babies, Sophisticated Animals (great Apes, Orcas), Unsophisticated Animals (bees), And Machinery (drones, Driverless Cars). Azzouni Also Gives A Fresh Defense Of Fallibilism. Relying On Lexical Semantics And Ordinary Usage, He Shows That There Are No Knowledge Norms For Assertion Or Action. He Examines Everyday Cases Of Knowledge Challenge And Attribution To Show Many Recent And Popular Epistemological Positions Are Wrong. By Providing A Long-sought Intelligible Characterization Of Knowledge Attribution, Azzouni Explains Why The Concept Has Puzzled Philosophers So Long, And He Solves Longstanding And Recent Puzzles That Have Perplexed Epistemologists--including The Dogmatism Paradox, Gettier Puzzles, And The Surprise-exam Paradox.