
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Providing a rigorous and objective ethical analysis of nuclear deterrence, this book discusses such issues as the Soviet menace, possible holocaust, and strategic imperatives. At the same time, the authors unmask types of deterrence that they perceive essentially as moral evasions, maintaining that deterrence cannot be bluffing, pure counterforce, the lesser (or greater) evil, or a step towards disarmament. Concluding that deterrence is unjustifiable, this book examines the new questions of conscience that this raises for us all.
This book investigates the moral legitimacy of nuclear deterrence policies through a rigorous ethical framework. The authors, Germain Gabriel Grisez, John Finnis, and Joseph Boyle Jr., utilize principles of moral philosophy to challenge the strategic justifications often cited by policymakers. They argue that nuclear deterrence, by its very nature, relies on an intent to commit mass destruction, which they contend is fundamentally incompatible with moral action regardless of the geopolitical context.
What You Will Find
Experts recognize this work as a significant contribution to the philosophical discourse on nuclear ethics and the morality of war. Readers frequently note the dense, analytical nature of the prose, which demands a high level of engagement with moral theory.
Page Count:
448
Publication Date:
1988-09-15
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
ISBN-10:
0198247915
ISBN-13:
9780198247913
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!