
Is the concept of accident purely a creation of Western judicial processes? In this innovative study, Goldman examines the ground between law, linguistics, and anthropology to provide the first full-length ethnography on the grammar and pragmatics of the rarely acknowledged or researched topic of accident. Using transcript case data from the Huli people of Papua New Guinea, Goldman explores the linguistic encoding of intentionality, causality, responsibility, and control to show how actors dispute in volitional (murder) or non-volitional (coincidence) idioms. Dr Goldman concludes that, with regard to the concept of accident, Western and non-Western juristic ideologies exhibit startling similarities; his study has important implications for the way we describe the world views of other cultures.
This study investigates whether the concept of accident is a unique product of Western judicial systems or a universal human cognitive framework. Laurence Goldman, an expert in social and cultural anthropology, utilizes extensive ethnographic fieldwork and linguistic analysis to examine how the Huli people of Papua New Guinea conceptualize causality and responsibility. By analyzing transcript case data, the author argues that non-Western societies possess sophisticated legal ideologies regarding non-volitional events that mirror Western notions of absolute liability.
What You Will Find
Scholars in the field of legal anthropology recognize this work as a foundational text for understanding how non-Western cultures categorize liability. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which effectively bridges the gap between linguistic theory and ethnographic practice.
Page Count:
464
Publication Date:
1993-04-08
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
019827873X
ISBN-13:
9780198278733
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!