
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Georg Lukács wrote that there is autonomy and 'autonomy.' The one is a moment of life itself, the elevation of its richness and contradictory unity; the other is a rigidification, a barren self-seclusion, a self-imposed banishment from the dynamic overall connection. Though Lukács' concern was with the conditions for the possibility of art, his distinction also serves as an apt description of the way that Hegel and Hegelians have contrasted their own interpretations of self-determination with that of Kant. But it has always been difficult to see how elevation is possible without seclusion, or how rigidification can be avoided without making the boundaries of the self so malleable that its autonomy looks like a mere cover for the power of external forces. Yeomans explores Hegel's own attempts to grapple with this problem against the background of Kant's attempts, in his theory of virtue, to understand the way that morally autonomous agents can be robust individuals with qualitatively different projects, personal relations, and commitments that are nonetheless infused with a value that demands respect. In a reading that disentangles a number of different threads in Kant's approach, Yeomans shows how Hegel reweaves these threads around the central notions of talent and interest to produce a tapestry of self-determination. Yeomans argues that the result is a striking pluralism that identifies three qualitatively distinct forms of agency or accountability and sees each of these forms of agency as being embodied in different social groups in different ways. But there is nonetheless a dynamic unity to the forms because they can all be understood as practical attempts to solve the problem of autonomy, and each is thus worthy of respect even from the perspective of other solutions. Everyone recognizes the importance of Hegel's critique of Kantian morality as empty, but until now there has not been a fully worked out presentation of how Hegel's views in his discussion of Sittlichkeit provide a positive alternative.
How can an individual achieve genuine self-determination without falling into either rigid isolation or total absorption by external forces? Christopher Yeomans, a scholar of German Idealism, investigates this central tension by contrasting Kantian moral autonomy with Hegel's social and practical framework. By analyzing Hegel's critique of Kant, Yeomans argues that Hegel provides a more robust, pluralistic model of agency that accounts for individual interests and social embodiment while maintaining a dynamic unity.
What You Will Find
Scholars recognize this work as a significant contribution to the study of Hegelian ethics and the evolution of autonomy in German philosophy. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for those already familiar with the foundational texts of Kant and Hegel.
Page Count:
256
Publication Date:
2015-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0199394555
ISBN-13:
9780199394555
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!