
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
A new breed of journalists came to the fore in post-revolutionary America--fiercely partisan, highly ideological, and possessed of a bold sense of vocation and purpose as they entered the fray of political debate. Often condemned by latter-day historians and widely seen in their own time as a threat to public and personal civility, these colorful figures emerge in this provocative new book as the era's most important agents of political democracy. Through incisive portraits of the most influential journalists of the 1790s--William Cobbett, Benjamin Franklin Bache, Philip Freneau, Noah Webster, John Fenno, and William Duane--Scandal and Civility moves beyond the usual cast of Revolutionary brothers and Founding Fathers to offer a fresh perspective on a seemingly familiar story. Marcus Daniel demonstrates how partisan journalists, both Federalist and Democratic-Republican, were instrumental in igniting and expanding vital debates over the character of political leaders, the nature of representative government, and, ultimately, the role of the free press itself. Their rejection of civility and self-restraint--not even icons like George Washington were spared their satirical skewerings--earned these men the label peddlers of scurrility. Yet, as Daniel shows, by breaking with earlier conceptions of impartial journalism, they challenged the elite dominance of political discourse and helped fuel the enormous political creativity of the early Republic. Daniel's nuanced and penetrating narrative captures this key period of American history in all its contentious complexity. And in today's climate, when many decry media excesses and the relentlessly partisan and personal character of political debate, his book is a timely reminder that discord and difference were essential to the very creation of our political culture.
This book investigates how the emergence of fiercely partisan journalism in post-revolutionary America functioned as a critical catalyst for the development of democratic political culture. Marcus Leonard Daniel, a historian specializing in the early American Republic, utilizes primary source materials and biographical analysis to argue that the aggressive, often scandalous rhetoric of 1790s journalists was not merely a threat to civility, but a vital mechanism for expanding political participation. By examining the shift away from impartial reporting, the author demonstrates how these figures challenged elite control over public discourse and shaped the foundational role of the free press in a representative government.
What You Will Find
Historians and political scholars frequently cite this work as a significant contribution to understanding the origins of American partisan media. Experts highlight the author's ability to contextualize historical vitriol within the broader framework of democratic growth, making it a valuable resource for those studying the early Republic.
Page Count:
400
Publication Date:
2009-01-01
Publisher:
Ebsco Publishing
ISBN-10:
0199721440
ISBN-13:
9780199721443
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!