
Unlike the rest of the advanced industrialized world, the United States does not have a national healthcare system that guarantees that all residents have access to medical services. Over the past century a number of unsuccessful attempts have been made to create and implement a unified, coordinated healthcare system. Piecemeal progress has been made, such as with the passage of Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act. However, the US still has the dubious distinction of possessing the most expensive healthcare in the world as well as health-related outcomes that are shameful for a wealthy country, mostly due to the number of people who lack decent care. The continuing escalation in medical costs is also threatening the financial stability of the nation.In his first book, Rationing is Not a Four-Letter Word, Philip M. Rosoff argued that the only way to control costs is to impose rationing, and the only way to do so fairly is to have it apply to all. The key to rationing is how it is accomplished. He outlined a general approach to making rationing decisions that involved a comprehensive explication of procedural fairness and illustrated this with the real-life accepted system of solid organ allocation for transplantation. In this book, he discusses how to decide what should and should not be covered in a generous benefits plan for all. He considers a variety of ways this might be done and concludes that the most just approach is to utilize a transparent process in which experts and lay people develop a consensus on what should be covered by focusing on both clinical evidence of need and the effective and appropriate means to address those needs. He also considers the various objections and impediments to this proposal and concludes that they are obstacles that can be successfully met.
This book investigates the ethical and practical mechanisms required to establish a fair, transparent system for healthcare rationing in the United States. Philip M. Rosoff, a physician and bioethicist, builds upon his previous work to address the specific challenge of defining the boundaries of a universal benefits plan. He utilizes a framework of procedural fairness, arguing that consensus-based decision-making—grounded in clinical evidence and societal values—is the most equitable method for determining coverage limits.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts in bioethics and health policy recognize this work as a significant contribution to the ongoing debate regarding universal healthcare access. Readers frequently note the academic rigor of the prose, which balances philosophical inquiry with practical policy considerations.
Page Count:
328
Publication Date:
2016-12-05
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
019020656X
ISBN-13:
9780190206567
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!