
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
In this book Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski gives an extended argument that the self-reflective person is committed to belief on authority. Epistemic authority is compatible with autonomy, but epistemic self-reliance is incoherent. She argues that epistemic and emotional self-trust are rational and inescapable, that consistent self-trust commits us to trust in others, and that among those we are committed to trusting are some whom we ought to treat as epistemic authorities, modeled on the well-known principles of authority of Joseph Raz. Some of these authorities can be in the moral and religious domains.Why have people for thousands of years accepted epistemic authority in religious communities? A religious community's justification for authority is typically based on beliefs unique to that community. Unfortunately, that often means that from the community's perspective, its justifying claims are insulated from the outside; whereas from an outside perspective, epistemic authority in the community appears unjustified. But as Zagzebski's argument shows, an individual's acceptance of authority in her community can be justified by principles that outsiders accept, and the particular beliefs justified by that authority are not immune to external critiques.
This work investigates the fundamental question of whether the commitment to epistemic authority is compatible with individual autonomy and rational self-trust. Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski, a prominent philosopher of religion and epistemology, constructs a framework arguing that epistemic self-reliance is inherently incoherent. She posits that rational agents must necessarily trust their own cognitive faculties, and that this self-trust logically necessitates a commitment to trusting the epistemic authority of others, including in moral and religious domains.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars in the field of epistemology frequently cite this text as a significant contribution to the debate on the rationality of deference to others. Readers often note the high level of academic rigor and the dense, analytical nature of the prose which requires familiarity with contemporary philosophical discourse.
Page Count:
296
Publication Date:
2015-11-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0190278269
ISBN-13:
9780190278267
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!