
The question of the proper role of metaphysics in philosophy of science is both significant and contentious. The last few decades have seen considerable engagement with philosophical projects aptly described as "the metaphysics of science:" inquiries into natural laws and properties, natural kinds, causal relations, and dispositions. At the same time, many metaphysicians have begun moving in the direction of more scientifically-informed ("scientistic" or "naturalistic") metaphysics. And yet many philosophers of science retain a deep suspicion about the significance of metaphysical investigations into science. This volume of new essays explores a broadly methodological question: what role should metaphysics play in our philosophizing about science? These new essays, written by leading philosophers of science, address this question both through ground-level investigations of particular issues in the metaphysics of science and by more general methodological inquiry.
This volume investigates the contentious methodological question of what role metaphysics should occupy within the philosophy of science. Editors Matthew Slater and Zanja Yudell compile contributions from leading philosophers to examine the intersection of metaphysical inquiry and scientific practice. The text evaluates whether metaphysical projects, such as the study of natural laws and causal relations, remain relevant or necessary in an increasingly naturalistic philosophical landscape.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts identify this collection as a significant contribution to the ongoing debate regarding the boundaries of scientific philosophy. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for scholars and advanced students of philosophy.
Page Count:
258
Publication Date:
2017-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0190669845
ISBN-13:
9780190669843
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!