
When we think of constitutional law, we invariably think of the United States Supreme Court and the federal court system. Yet much of our constitutional law is not made at the federal level. In 51 Imperfect Solutions, U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton argues that American Constitutional Law should account for the role of the state courts and state constitutions, together with the federal courts and the federal constitution, in protecting individual liberties.The book tells four stories that arise in four different areas of constitutional law: equal protection; criminal procedure; privacy; and free speech and free exercise of religion. Traditional accounts of these bedrock debates about the relationship of the individual to the state focus on decisions of the United States Supreme Court. But these explanations tell just part of the story. The book corrects this omission by looking at each issue-and some others as well-through the lens of many constitutions, not one constitution; of many courts, not one court; and of all American judges, not federal or state judges. Taken together, the stories reveal a remarkably complex, nuanced, ever-changing federalist system, one that ought to make lawyers and litigants pause before reflexively assuming that the United States Supreme Court alone has all of the answers to the most vexing constitutional questions.If there is a central conviction of the book, it's that an underappreciation of state constitutional law has hurt state and federal law and has undermined the appropriate balance between state and federal courts in protecting individual liberty. In trying to correct this imbalance, the book also offers several ideas for reform.
This book investigates the neglected role of state constitutions and state courts in the development of American constitutional law, challenging the federal-centric view of individual liberty protections. Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton, a sitting U.S. Court of Appeals judge, utilizes his extensive judicial experience and historical analysis to argue that the current reliance on the U.S. Supreme Court has created an imbalance that weakens the federalist system. He posits that a more robust engagement with state-level legal frameworks is necessary to properly protect individual rights and restore the intended constitutional equilibrium.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Legal scholars and practitioners frequently cite this work as a significant contribution to the study of federalism and judicial interpretation. Experts highlight the text for its practical utility in the courtroom and its ability to reframe standard constitutional debates for both students and experienced attorneys.
Page Count:
296
Publication Date:
2018-06-04
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0190866047
ISBN-13:
9780190866044
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!