
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
This Volume Presents A Dozen Essays By Prominent Contemporary Epistemologists Providing A Careful Examination And Critical Evaluation Of Traditional Epistemic Internalism. Unlike Competing Versions Of Internalism, The Guiding Principle Of Traditional Internalism Is Not To Accommodate Our Commonsense Nonskeptical Views About The Rationality Of Our Ordinary Beliefs, But To Emphasize The Need For Strong Skepticism-resistant Intellectual Assurance That Our Ordinary Beliefs (perceptual And Otherwise) Are True. The Essays Focus On What Traditional Internalism Has To Say About The Following Three Topics: The Nature Of Non-inferentially Justified Belief, The Nature Of Inferentially Justified Belief, And The Best Way To Respond To Skepticism. The End Product Is A Volume Containing Many Probing Objections To Traditional Internalism, Pushing Its Proponents To Provide Creative New Defenses If They Want This Old-fashioned View To Survive In The Modern World.
This volume investigates whether traditional epistemic internalism can provide a robust, skepticism-resistant foundation for the rationality of our ordinary beliefs. Editors Brett Coppenger and Michael Bergmann compile twelve essays from contemporary epistemologists to evaluate the viability of this classical framework. The contributors analyze whether internalism can withstand modern scrutiny or if it requires significant theoretical revision to remain relevant in contemporary discourse.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts identify this collection as a rigorous contribution to the ongoing debate regarding epistemic justification. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, making it most suitable for advanced students and professional philosophers.
Page Count:
256
Publication Date:
2016-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0191030333
ISBN-13:
9780191030338
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!