
What are appropriate criteria for assessing a theory of morality? In Ideal Code, Real World, Brad Hooker begins by answering this question, and then argues for a rule-consequentialist theory. According to rule-consequentialism, acts should be assessed morally in terms of impartially justified rules, and rules are impartially justified if and only if the expected overall value of their general internalization is at least as great as for any alternative rules. In the course of developing his rule-consequentialism, Hooker discusses impartiality, well-being, fairness, equality, the question of how the 'general internalization' of rules is to be interpreted by rule-consequentialism, and the main objections to rule-consequentialism. He also discusses the social contract theory of morality, act-consequentialism, and the question of which moral prohibitions and which duties to help others rule-consequentialism endorses. The last part of the book considers the implications of rule-consequentialism for some current controversies in practical ethics.
This work investigates the criteria for assessing moral theories and proposes a rule-consequentialist framework as a robust alternative to competing ethical systems. Brad Hooker, a prominent philosopher, utilizes analytical moral theory to argue that acts should be evaluated based on impartially justified rules. He posits that these rules are justified if their general internalization produces the greatest expected overall value compared to any alternative set of rules.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars and students of moral philosophy frequently cite this work as a foundational text for understanding modern rule-consequentialism. Readers often note the rigorous academic density of the prose, which requires a strong background in ethical theory to fully synthesize the author's arguments.
Page Count:
232
Publication Date:
2000-01-01
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
ISBN-10:
0191520268
ISBN-13:
9780191520266
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!