
Philosophers since Aristotle have traditionally held that impossibilities make up the nature of logic. Sanford Shieh investigates an important but underexplored break with this tradition: Frege and Russell questioned whether there really are such things as possibilities or necessities, and sought the foundations of logic elsewhere.
This work investigates the historical and philosophical shift in early analytic philosophy regarding the status of necessity and possibility in logic. Sanford Shieh, a scholar of analytic philosophy, examines the transition away from the Aristotelian tradition that viewed necessity as a fundamental component of logical structure. By analyzing the works of Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, the author explores how these thinkers sought to establish the foundations of logic by questioning the ontological status of modal concepts.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts recognize this text as a rigorous examination of the foundational tensions within early analytic thought. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for those with a strong background in formal logic and the history of philosophy.
Page Count:
0
Publication Date:
1900-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press,
ISBN-10:
0191871141
ISBN-13:
9780191871146
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!