
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The Influence Of International Courts Is Ubiquitous, Covering Areas From The Law Of The Sea To International Criminal Law. This Judicialization Of International Law Is Often Lauded For Bringing Effective Global Governance, Upholding The Rule Of Law, And Protecting The Right Of Individuals. Yet At What Point Does The Omnipresence Of The International Judiciary Shackle National Sovereign Freedom? And Can The Lack Of Political Accountability Be Justified? Follesdal And Ulfstein Bring Together The Crème De La Crème Of The Legal Academic World To Ask The Big Questions For The International Judiciary: Whether They Are There For Mere Dispute Settlement Or To Set Precedent, And How Far They Can Enforce International Obligations Without Impacting On Democratic Self-determination.
This book investigates the tension between the expanding authority of international courts and the preservation of national sovereign freedom and democratic accountability. Andreas Follesdal and Geir Ulfstein, both prominent scholars in international law and human rights, curate a collection of essays from leading legal academics. The text evaluates whether international judicial bodies function primarily as dispute settlement mechanisms or as architects of legal precedent, and examines the legitimacy of their enforcement powers in relation to domestic democratic processes.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts identify this collection as a significant contribution to the discourse on global governance and the legitimacy of international institutions. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is tailored for scholars, legal professionals, and advanced students of international relations.
Page Count:
288
Publication Date:
2018-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0192548387
ISBN-13:
9780192548382
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!