
This is the first book to use a comparative approach to examine the effect of different constitutional and legal traditions on privatization. Focusing on privatization in the UK and France, Graham and Prosser suggest that the British Government was remarkably free from constitutional limitation, whereas in France the written constitution imposed important restrictions on the scope of privatization and on the arrangements for the pricing of shares. This detailed analysis of the effect of legal constraints on economic policy adds a constitutional dimension to what has primarily been seen as an economic issue, and will make a unique and valuable contribution to current debates in political studies.
This book investigates how varying constitutional frameworks and legal traditions fundamentally shape the implementation and regulation of state-owned enterprise privatization. Authors Cosmo Graham and Tony Prosser utilize a comparative methodology to contrast the experiences of the United Kingdom and France. They argue that economic policy is not merely a matter of market mechanics but is deeply constrained by the specific legal and constitutional architectures of the state, which dictate the limits of government authority and the protection of public interests.
What You Will Find
Experts recognize this work as a significant contribution to the intersection of constitutional law and political economy. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which serves as a foundational text for those studying the regulatory constraints on government-led economic reform.
Page Count:
288
Publication Date:
1991-04-11
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
ISBN-10:
0198273398
ISBN-13:
9780198273394
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!