
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Why Did Political Economy Become Pre-eminent In The Emergence And Development Of The Social Sciences? From A Relatively Early Stage In Its Development Political Economy Was Accepted As A Legitimate, If Minor, Part Of A General Liberal Education. However, Economic Science Did Not Become Firmly Rooted In The Academic Curriculum Of The Modern English University Until After The First World War. The Market For Political Economy Argues That Whilst It Is Commonly Assumed That The Complexities Of A Modern Industrial Economy Would Require A Greater Number Of Trained Economists, The Actual Demand Amongst Employers Remained Low. The Book Traces The Development Of The Teaching Of Political Economy In The Second Half Of The Nineteenth Century.
This work investigates the historical discrepancy between the perceived necessity of political economy in industrial society and the actual, limited demand for trained economists within the late nineteenth-century British academic and professional landscape. Alon Kadish and Keith Tribe utilize institutional history and archival analysis to challenge the assumption that the rise of modern industrialization automatically necessitated a corresponding expansion in economic education. The authors demonstrate that political economy struggled to establish itself as a core academic discipline until the post-World War I era, despite its presence in liberal education.
What You Will Find
Scholars in the history of economic thought recognize this text as a rigorous examination of the institutional barriers faced by early social sciences. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which provides a comprehensive look at the structural evolution of university curricula during the Victorian era.
Page Count:
272
Publication Date:
1993-01-01
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis Group
ISBN-10:
0203406176
ISBN-13:
9780203406175
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!