
Antithetical Arts constitutes a defence of musical formalism against those who would put literary interpretations on the absolute music canon. In Part I, the historical origins of both the literary interpretation of absolute music and musical formalism are laid out. In Part II, specific attempts to put literary interpretations on various works of the absolute music canon are examined and criticized. Finally, in Part III, the question is raised as to what the human significance of absolute music is, if it does not lie in its representational or narrative content. The answer is that, as yet, philosophy has no answer, and that the question should be considered an important one for philosophers of art to consider, and to try to answer without appeal to representational or narrative content.
This work investigates the philosophical validity of applying literary and narrative interpretations to absolute music. Peter Kivy, a prominent philosopher of music, utilizes historical analysis and critical examination of specific musical works to defend the position of musical formalism. He argues that the tendency to impose literary meaning onto non-representational music obscures the intrinsic value of the art form and challenges the field to seek alternative explanations for the human significance of music.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts recognize this text as a significant contribution to the philosophy of music, particularly for its rigorous defense of formalist aesthetics. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for those with a background in philosophical discourse or musicology.
Page Count:
300
Publication Date:
2011-01-01
Publisher:
OUP Oxford
ISBN-10:
0191615757
ISBN-13:
9780191615757
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!