
Philosophers have always recognized the value of reason, but the process of reasoning itself has only recently begun to emerge as a philosophical topic in its own right. Is reasoning a distinctive kind of mental process? If so, what is its nature? How does reasoning differ from merely freely associating thoughts? What is the relationship between reasoning about what to believe and reasoning about how to act? Is reasoning itself something you do, or something that happens to you? And what is the value of reasoning? Are there rules for good or correct reasoning and, if so, what are they like? Does good reasoning always lead to justified belief or rational action? Is there more than one way to reason correctly from your evidence? This volume comprises twelve new essays by leading researchers in the philosophy of reasoning that together address these questions and many more, and explore the connections between them.
This volume investigates the fundamental nature, mechanics, and normative value of reasoning as a distinct mental process. Editors Brendan Balcerak Jackson and Magdalena Balcerak Jackson curate a collection of twelve original essays from prominent philosophers to examine the boundaries between belief-formation and practical action. The work seeks to establish a rigorous framework for understanding whether reasoning is an active agency or a passive occurrence, and how it adheres to standards of correctness.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts identify this collection as a significant contribution to the burgeoning field of the philosophy of reasoning. Readers frequently note the high level of academic density, making it a resource primarily intended for graduate-level researchers and professional philosophers.
Page Count:
283
Publication Date:
2019-01-01
Publisher:
OUP Oxford
ISBN-10:
0192509063
ISBN-13:
9780192509062
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!