
This Book Addresses A Concept- That Of The Organism, Or Biological Individual - Which Is Used Across Biology To Pick Out Living Things, But Which Is Contested. I Argue That We Can Arbitrate Arguments About The Concept By Delving Into Philosophical Questions About What Concepts Are For, In Order To Formulate Some Plausible Success Criteria Against Which The Performance Of Rival Concepts Can Be Evaluated. I Defend A Particular, Evolutionary, Way Of Understanding The Concept As Outperforming Its Rivals In Terms Of The Kind And Range Of Work It Supports. More Generally, I Argue That Kind Concepts Are Like Scientific Models, In That They Distort And Idealise The Natural World For The Sake Of Making It Easier For Us To Think, Talk And Entertain Useful Expectations About, That World
This book investigates the contested definition of the biological individual and proposes a framework for evaluating competing concepts of the organism. Author Ellen Clarke, a philosopher of biology, utilizes a methodology rooted in conceptual analysis and the philosophy of science to argue that biological concepts function as scientific models. By establishing success criteria for these concepts, she defends an evolutionary understanding of the organism as the most effective tool for scientific inquiry.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts in the philosophy of biology recognize this work as a rigorous contribution to the debate surrounding biological individuality. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for scholars and advanced students of the philosophy of science.
Page Count:
288
Publication Date:
2025-01-01
Publisher:
New York : Oxford University Press,
ISBN-10:
0192857193
ISBN-13:
9780192857194
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!