This book investigates whether legal theory is fundamentally dependent upon a theory of interpretation. Andrei Marmor, a prominent scholar in legal philosophy, evaluates the interpretative turn in jurisprudence by contrasting it against traditional legal positivism. He utilizes analytical philosophy to dissect the role of authorial intent and the nature of adjudication, ultimately arguing for the continued relevance of positivist frameworks in the face of interpretative challenges.

Legal scholars and students of jurisprudence frequently identify this text as a rigorous contribution to the debate between positivist and interpretative schools of thought. Experts highlight the book's analytical density and its precise engagement with the foundational questions of legal philosophy.