Author Description

From Social Media To Search Engines To Wikipedia, The Internet Is Thoroughly Embedded In How We Produce, Locate, And Share Knowledge Around The World. Who Should We Be Online? Provides An Account Of Online Knowledge That Takes Seriously The Role Of Sexist, Racist, Transphobic, Colonial, And Capitalist Forms Of Oppression. Frost-arnold Argues Against Analyzing Internet Users As A Collection Of Identical Generic People With Smartphones. The Novel Epistemology Developed In This Book Recognizes That We Are Differently Embodied Beings Interacting Within Systems Of Dominance. Our Social Identities And Global Inequalities Shape Who We Are, Who We Can Be Online, And What We Know. Tackling Problems Of Online Content Moderation, Fake News, And Hoaxes, Frost-arnold Shows That Oppressive Online Structures And Practices Help Fuel Ignorance. But She Also Reveals How The Internet Provides Opportunities For Marginalized People And Activists To Share Knowledge Online. Drawing On Feminist Accounts Of Objectivity, Veritistic Social Epistemology, Epistemologies Of Ignorance, Virtue Epistemology, And The Epistemic Injustice Literature, This Book Argues For A Social Epistemology That Values Truth And Objectivity, While Recognizing That Inequalities Shape Our Collective Ability To Attain These Goals. Timely And Interdisciplinary, Who Should We Be Online? Weaves Together Internet Studies Scholarship From Across The Humanities, Social Sciences, And Computer Science. Presenting Case Studies Of Moderators, Imposters, Tricksters, Fakers, And Lurkers, This Book Both Explains The Problems With Our Current Internet Ecosystem And Imagines Liberatory Online Futures--