
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
This text is a defense of political liberalism as a feminist liberalism. The first half of the work develops and defends a novel interpretation of political liberalism. It is argued that political liberals should accept a restrictive account of public reason and that political liberals' account of public justification is superior to the leading alternative, the convergence account of public justification. In the second half of the text, it is argued that political liberalism's core commitments restrict all reasonable conceptions of justice to those that secure genuine, substantive equality for women and other marginalized groups.
This work investigates whether political liberalism can be reconstructed as a robust framework for securing substantive equality for women and marginalized groups. Lori Watson and Christie Hartley argue that a restrictive account of public reason is necessary for political liberalism and that this model provides a more effective basis for public justification than the competing convergence account.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars in political philosophy frequently cite this work for its rigorous attempt to bridge the gap between abstract liberal theory and feminist political goals. Readers often note the academic density of the prose, which assumes a foundational understanding of contemporary political liberalism.
Page Count:
0
Publication Date:
1900-01-01
ISBN-10:
0190683066
ISBN-13:
9780190683061
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!