Author Description

This Is Not A Book About Hitchcock. There Are Many Of Those In Critical Circles, And I Wouldn't Presume To Add A Great Deal More To The Landmark Studies Of Scholars Such As Raymond Bellour, Robin Wood, And William Rothman, Among Many Others. But It Is A Book That Attempts To Situate Hitchcockian Cinema, And More Specifically, An Aspect Of The Hitchcockian Style In The Aftermath Of Hitchcock's Rich, Complex, And Sometimes Unwieldy Filmmaking Career. In A Series Of Discussions With François Truffaut In 1962, Hitchcock, Then At The Height Of His Influence As A Filmmaker And Prior To The Perceived Decline Of His Cinema In The Later 1960s, Gestures Toward An Artistic Disposition In The Following Exchange On Rear Window (1954): Truffaut: I Imagine That The Story Appealed To You Primarily Because It Represented A Technical Challenge: A Whole Film From The Viewpoint Of One Man, And Embodied In A Single, Large Set. Hitchcock: Absolutely. It Was A Possibility Of Doing A Purely Cinematic Film. You Have An Immobilized Man Looking Out. That's One Part Of The Film. The Second Part Shows What He Sees And The Third Part Shows How He Reacts. This Is Actually The Purest Expression Of A Cinematic Idea.