
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
In This Volume, Leading Philosophers Discuss The Evaluation Of Death And Its Relevance For Health Policy. The Authors Challenge The Current Practice Of Assessing Newborn Deaths As The Worst Ones. It Also Discusses Whether Stillbirths Should Be Included In Our Evaluation Of Deaths, And Whether The Deaths Of Young Children Are Worse Than That Of Newborns-- Provided By Publisher.
This volume investigates the ethical framework used to evaluate the harm of death and its subsequent application in public health policy. The authors, Carl Tollef Solberg and Espen Gamlund, utilize philosophical inquiry to critique current metrics that prioritize newborn deaths as the most significant losses. By examining the moral weight assigned to different stages of life, the text challenges established norms regarding how society quantifies the tragedy of mortality.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts in bioethics recognize this work as a significant contribution to the ongoing debate regarding life-valuation metrics in public policy. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for scholars and policy makers interested in the intersection of philosophy and health administration.
Page Count:
0
Publication Date:
2019-01-01
Publisher:
New York, NY : Oxford University Press,
ISBN-10:
0190921447
ISBN-13:
9780190921446
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!