
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Contemporary Liberal Thinkers Commonly Suppose That There Is Something In Principle Unjust About The Legal Prohibition Of Putatively Victimless Immoralities. Against The Prevailing Liberal View, Robert P. George Defends The Proposition That `moral Laws' Can Play A Legitimate, If Subsidiary, Role In Preserving The `moral Ecology' Of The Cultural Environment In Which People Make The Morally Significant Choices By Which They Form Their Characters And Influence, For Good Or Ill, The Moral Lives Of Others. George Shows That A Defence Of Morals Legislation Is Fully Compatible With A `pluralistic Perfectionist' Political Theory Of Civil Liberties And Public Morality.
This work investigates whether the legal prohibition of victimless immoralities is inherently unjust within a liberal democratic framework. Robert P. George, a prominent legal scholar and professor of jurisprudence, challenges the prevailing liberal consensus by arguing that moral legislation serves a necessary function in maintaining the cultural environment. He posits that the state has a legitimate, albeit limited, role in fostering the conditions under which individuals develop their moral character.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars and legal theorists frequently cite this work as a significant contribution to the debate on perfectionist political theory. Readers often note the high level of academic rigor and the dense, philosophical nature of the prose throughout the text.
Page Count:
258
Publication Date:
1995-01-01
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
ISBN-10:
0191029602
ISBN-13:
9780191029608
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!