
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The most famous challenge to the aims of computational cognitive science and artificial intelligence is the philosopher John Searle's 1980 'Chinese Room' argument. Searle argued that the fact that machines can be devised to pass the 'Turing Test', that is, respond to input with the same output that a mind would give, does not mean that mind and machine are doing the same thing: for such machines lack understanding of the symbols they process. Nineteen specially written essays by leading scientists and philosophers assess, renew, and respond to this crucial challenge—fascinating reading for anyone interested in minds and computers.
This collection of essays investigates the validity and implications of John Searle's 1980 'Chinese Room' argument regarding the nature of machine understanding. Edited by John Preston and Mark Bishop, the volume compiles nineteen original contributions from prominent philosophers and scientists to evaluate whether computational systems can truly possess intentionality or if they merely simulate cognitive processes without comprehension.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts and scholars in the field of philosophy of mind recognize this collection as a comprehensive resource for understanding the ongoing debate surrounding Searle's thought experiment. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is best suited for those with a background in cognitive science or formal philosophy.
Page Count:
426
Publication Date:
2002-01-01
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
ISBN-10:
0191040401
ISBN-13:
9780191040405
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!