
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Killing A Person Is In General Among The Most Seriously Wrongful Forms Of Action, Yet Most Of Us Accept That It Can Be Permissible To Kill People On A Large Scale In War. Does Morality Become More Permissive In A State Of War? Jeff Mcmahan Argues That Conditions In War Make No Difference To What Morality Permits And The Justifications For Killing People Are The Same In War As They Are In Other Contexts, Such As Individual Self-defence. This View Is Radically At Odds With The Traditional Theory Of The Just War And Has Implications That Challenge Common Sense Views. Mcmahan Argues, For Example, That It Is Wrong To Fight In A War That Is Unjust Because It Lacks A Just Cause.
Does the state of war fundamentally alter the moral constraints that govern the killing of human beings? Jeff McMahan, a prominent philosopher in the field of normative ethics, challenges the traditional Just War Theory by arguing that the moral justifications for killing in war are identical to those in civilian contexts, such as individual self-defense.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars and ethicists frequently cite this work as a foundational text for contemporary debates regarding the morality of combat. Readers often note the rigorous analytical density of the prose, which requires a strong background in moral philosophy to fully grasp the implications of the author's arguments.
Page Count:
272
Publication Date:
2009-01-01
Publisher:
Ebsco Publishing
ISBN-10:
0191563463
ISBN-13:
9780191563461
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!