
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Although it is often thought that Herodotus is a simple author, and that his Histories do not contain many passages requiring textual criticism, closer investigation reveals this view to be inaccurate. Written to accompany and augment the new Oxford Classical Texts edition of the Histories - which has been substantially revised by Nigel Wilson from the original edition by Danish scholar C. Hude in 1906 - this volume attempts to take account of discussion of numerous passages where there is reason to question whether the text as transmitted in ancient or medieval manuscripts is exactly what the author intended. A wide range of conjectures is represented, and work by scholars whose contributions have been neglected or insufficiently appreciated, in particular J. V. Pingel, H. Richards, and J. E. Powell, is taken into account.
This volume investigates the necessity of rigorous textual criticism for the Histories of Herodotus, challenging the assumption that the text is simple and free of corruption. Nigel Wilson, a distinguished scholar of classical texts, utilizes his extensive experience in editing the Oxford Classical Texts series to re-examine the manuscript tradition. He argues that numerous passages require scholarly intervention to recover the author's original intent, drawing upon both established and neglected critical contributions.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars and classicists recognize this work as a technical companion to the Oxford Classical Texts edition, valued for its precision in philological inquiry. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for specialists in Greek textual criticism.
Page Count:
250
Publication Date:
2015-01-01
Publisher:
OUP Oxford
ISBN-10:
0191653535
ISBN-13:
9780191653537
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!