
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Mass media ethics and the classical liberal ideal of the autonomous individual are historically linked and professionally dominant--yet the authors of this work feel this is intrinsically flawed. They show how recent research in philosophy and social science--together with a longer tradition in theological inquiry--insist that community, mutuality, and relationship are fundamental to a full concept of personhood. The authors argue that "persons-in-community" provides a more defensible grounding for journalists' professional moral decison-making in crucial areas such as truthtelling, privacy, organizational culture, and balanced coverage. With numerous examples drawn from life as well as from theory, this book will interest journalists, editors, and professionals in media management as well as students and scholars of media ethics, reporting, and media law.
This book investigates the inherent flaws in the classical liberal ideal of the autonomous individual as the foundation for media ethics. The authors, Clifford G. Christians, John P. Ferré, and P. Mark Fackler, synthesize research from philosophy, social science, and theological inquiry to challenge the prevailing professional standards in journalism. They propose a shift toward a "persons-in-community" framework, arguing that mutuality and relationship are essential components of moral decision-making in the press.
What You Will Find
Experts and scholars in the field of media ethics recognize this work as a significant contribution to the discourse on professional responsibility. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which makes it a foundational text for students and professionals examining the intersection of social ethics and journalism.
Page Count:
288
Publication Date:
1993-06-03
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0195074319
ISBN-13:
9780195074314
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!