Author Description

This book argues that we have a duty to understand the stakes involved in the conflation of what is supposedly "natural" with what is statistically "normal," and of what is "normal" with what is "healthy." Each chapter examines a specific set of relations through which medical and cultural discourses support each other, and assesses the impact of that continuous process on medical practice, ethics, and cultural perception for those labeled "intersexed." The book also offers counter-narratives to encourage a new way of seeing intersexed people: as viable, desirable, and uniquely beautiful. "Intersex: A Perilous Difference demonstrates that for those apprehended by medicine as intersexed - the modern medical term for hermaphroditism - the rights taken to be obvious for others (agency, autonomy, and a place inside the social order) are compromised, even imperiled,^ and contradict generally accepted ethical duties to protect as a developing potential the autonomy and agency of all infants and minors. While medicine typically locates the source of peril in the presumed unintelligibility of intersexed bodies themselves, and argues that there can be no place for an intersexed subject or body inside the social order, the personal narratives and autoethnography offered here show that intersexed persons can live as perfectly intelligible, social, and sexual subjects, even with their atypical anatomies intact. From this observation the author develops an argument to show that the source of peril is not in or on intersexed bodies but that it arises in the interactions between myth and medicine, between popular culture and the clinic.^ Indeed, the narrative evidence under examination here indicates that it is not in their embodied difference but in their experiences of medicalization that intersexed people are thrown into personal crisis." The author's explorations offer readers a unique assessment of medicine as a form of cultural practices integrally joined with - rather