
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Cover -- Moral Uncertainty -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Introduction -- Chapter 1: Why We Should Take Moral Uncertainty Seriously -- Introduction -- I. Why We Should Be Morally Uncertain -- The Difficulty Of Ethics -- Moral Disagreement -- Overconfidence -- Ii. The Motivation For Taking Moral Uncertainty Seriously -- Iii. Objections To Taking Moral Uncertainty Seriously -- The Fetishism Objection -- The Regress Objection -- The Blameworthiness Objection -- The Conscientiousness Objection -- Disanalogy With Prudential Reasoning -- Conclusion Chapter 2: Maximizing Expected Choiceworthiness -- Introduction -- I. Against My Favorite Theory -- Ii. In Favour Of Trade-offs -- Iii. In Favour Of Treating Moral And Empirical Uncertainty Analogously -- Iv. Two Objections To Mec -- Demandingness -- Supererogation -- Conclusion -- Chapter 3: Ordinal Theories And The Social Choice Analogy -- Introduction -- I. Intertheoretic Comparisons And Ordinal Theories -- Ii. Moral Uncertainty And The Social Choice Analogy -- Iii. Some Voting Systems -- Iv. The Borda Rule -- Conclusion -- Chapter 4: Interval-scale Theories And Variance Voting -- Introduction I. Intertheoretic Incomparability -- Ii. Two Unsatisfactory Proposals -- Iii. Variance Voting -- Iv. Two Arguments For Variance Voting -- Distance From The Uniform Theory -- The Expected Choice-worthiness Of Voting -- V. Option-individuation And Measure -- Vi. Broad Vs Narrow -- Vii. How To Act In Varying Informational Conditions -- Conclusion -- Chapter 5: Intertheoretic Comparisons Of Choice-worthiness -- Introduction -- I. Against Scepticism -- Ii. Structural Accounts -- Iii. Five Arguments Against Structural Accounts -- Varied-extension Cases -- Discontinuity With Universal Indifference Incoherent Beliefs-weighing Values -- Incoherent Beliefs-too Much Comparability -- Amplified Theories -- Iv. Non-structural Accounts -- V. Against Two Common Ground Accounts -- Vi. Against Two Universal Scale Accounts
This book investigates how individuals should act when they are uncertain about which moral theory is correct. The authors, William MacAskill, Krister Bykvist, and Toby Ord, utilize frameworks from decision theory and social choice theory to argue that moral uncertainty should be treated with the same rigor as empirical uncertainty. They propose a systematic approach to decision-making that accounts for competing moral views, aiming to provide a coherent method for navigating ethical dilemmas where the correct moral framework remains in dispute.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts in moral philosophy and decision theory recognize this work as a significant contribution to the formalization of normative ethics. Readers frequently note the high level of academic density and the technical nature of the prose, which assumes a strong background in philosophical logic.
Page Count:
224
Publication Date:
2020-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press,
ISBN-10:
0191033634
ISBN-13:
9780191033636
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!