
Richard Hooker (1554-1600) has traditionally been seen as the first systematic defender of an Anglican via media between Rome and Geneva. Revisionists have argued recently, however, that Hooker was in fact a thoroughly Reformed theologian. Dr Voak takes issue with this interpretation, arguing that Hooker over time became highly critical of numerous Reformed positions. Beginning with philosophical principles underlying Hooker's theology (e.g. free will, resistibility of grace), the book then considers issues such as original sin, justification and sanctification, merit and the religious authority of scripture, reason, and tradition. Finally, Hooker's late manuscripts are examined, in which he defends himself from the charge of heresy.
This study investigates whether Richard Hooker should be classified as a traditional defender of the Anglican via media or as a thoroughly Reformed theologian. Dr. Nigel Voak, a scholar of historical theology, challenges recent revisionist interpretations that align Hooker closely with Reformed orthodoxy. By analyzing Hooker's philosophical foundations and his evolving stance on key doctrines, Voak argues that Hooker increasingly distanced himself from Reformed positions throughout his career.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars recognize this work as a significant contribution to the ongoing debate regarding Hooker's place within the Reformed tradition. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose and the rigorous engagement with primary source material.
Page Count:
368
Publication Date:
2003-01-01
Publisher:
OUP Oxford
ISBN-10:
0191532010
ISBN-13:
9780191532016
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!