
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
In The Metaphysics Of The Material World, Tad M. Schmaltz Traces A Particular Development Of The Metaphysics Of The Material World In Early Modern Thought. The Route Schmaltz Follows Derives From A Critique Of Spinoza In The Work Of Pierre Bayle. Bayle Charged In Particular That Spinoza's Monistic Conception Of The Material World Founders On The Account Of Extension And Its Modes And Parts That He Inherited From Descartes, And That Descartes In Turn Inherited From Late Scholasticism, And Ultimately From Aristotle. After An Initial Discussion Of Bayle's Critique Of Spinoza And Its Relation To Aristotle's Distinction Between Substance And Accident, This Study Starts With The Original Re-conceptualization Of Aristotle's Metaphysics Of The Material World That We Find In The Work Of The Early Modern Scholastic Suárez. What Receives Particular Attention Is Suárez's Introduction Of The Modal Distinction And His Distinctive Account Of The Aristotelian Accident Of Continuous Quantity. This Examination Of Suárez Is Followed By A Treatment Of The Connections Of His Particular Version Of The Scholastic Conception Of The Material World To The Very Different Conception That Descartes Offered. Especially Important Is Descartes's View Of The Relation Of Extended Substance Both To Its Modes And To The Parts That Compose It. Finally, There Is A Consideration Of What These Developments In Suárez And Descartes Have To Teach Us About Spinoza's Monistic Conception Of The Material World. Of Special Concern Here Is To Draw On This Historical Narrative To Provide A Re-assessment Of Bayle's Critique Of Spinoza.-- Machine Generated Contents Note: 1.bayle's Narrative -- 1.1.bayle's Aristotelian Critique Of Spinoza -- 1.2.aristotle's Metaphysics Of The Material World -- Pt. I Suarez -- 2.metaphysics And Material Modes -- 2.1.analogical Metaphysics -- 2.2.theory Of Distinctions I -- 2.3.the Metaphysics Of Material Modes -- 3.quantity, Integral Parts, And Boundaries -- 3.1.quantity And Impenetrability I -- 3.2.mereology And Integral Parts -- 3.3.boundaries As Indivisible Constituents -- Pt. Ii Descartes -- 4.metaphysical Themes From Suarez -- 4.1.theory Of Distinctions Ii -- 4.2.quantity And Impenetrability Ii -- 4.3.the Metaphysics Of Surfaces -- 5.material Pluralism And Ordinary Bodies -- 5.1.the Synopsis And Bodies-taken-in-general -- 5.2.incorruptibility And The Vacuum -- 5.3.ordinary Bodies, Human And Otherwise -- Pt. Iii Spinoza -- 6.metaphysical Themes From Descartes -- 6.1.the Nature Of Substance/attributes -- 6.2.the Nature Of Modes -- 6.3.from Extension To Motion-and-rest -- 7.material Monism And Bodily Parts -- 7.1.modal Parts And Divisible Quantity -- 7.2.the Mereology Of The Infinite Individual -- 7.3.parts, Modes, And Material Monism. Tad M. Schmaltz. Includes Bibliographical References And Index.
This work investigates the historical development of the metaphysics of the material world by tracing the conceptual lineage from late Scholasticism through Descartes to Spinoza. Tad M. Schmaltz, a scholar of early modern philosophy, utilizes the critical framework provided by Pierre Bayle to analyze how these thinkers navigated the relationship between substance, extension, and modes. By examining the transition from Aristotelian foundations to modern monism, the author argues that Spinoza's system must be understood as a response to specific tensions inherent in the Cartesian and Scholastic accounts of material quantity.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Scholars recognize this text as a rigorous contribution to the study of early modern ontology, particularly for its precise mapping of Scholastic influences on Cartesian thought. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which is intended for specialists in the history of philosophy.
Page Count:
0
Publication Date:
1900-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press,
ISBN-10:
0190070250
ISBN-13:
9780190070250
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!