Author Description

Few subjects have generated so many newspaper headlines and such heated controversy in recent years as the treatment or non-treatment, of handicapped newborns. This book, by two authorities on medical ethics,is a philosophical analysis of the subject, but accessibly written and rooted in practicalities and case studies throughout. The authors examine the doctrine of the absolute sanctity of human life; look at some actual examples where decisions have been made one way or the other; consider criteria for deciding when life is worthwhile; investigate the differences between killing and letting die; compare Western attitudes and practices with those of other cultures; and make proposals for a decision-making framework.Reviewing Peter Singer's book on ethics and sociology, The New Republic wrote:"Singer takes the reader through important and difficult questions with a lucidity which must be the envy of any writer on ethics." Reviewing his Practical Ethics, The New York Review of Books commented: "The utility of this utilitarian's book to students of the subject can hardly be exaggerated." These statements are equally true of Should the Baby Live? Among the questions discussed are:--Is it right to do less to prolong the life of a handicapped infant than one would do for a normal baby? If so, how severe must the handicap be?--Who should make the decision? The parents? The doctors? The courts?--Whose interest should be considered? Only the baby's? Or also those of the parents and other children they might have?--Should weight be given to the cost to society of extensive medical treatment and institutional care?