
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
In this provocative book, a professor of philosophy examines the arguments for and against euthanasia, analyzes specific case studies, including those of Baby Jane Doe and Barney Clark, and offers an alternate theory on the morality of euthanasia. Various traditional distinctions--between "human" and "non-human," intentional and nonintentional, killing and "letting die"--are taken into account to determine whether euthanasia is permissible or not. Rachels presents a systematic argument against the traditional view, defending an alternative position based on the belief that there is a profound difference between having a life and merely being alive.
This work investigates the moral permissibility of euthanasia by challenging traditional ethical distinctions regarding life and death. James Rachels, a professor of philosophy, utilizes a rigorous analytical framework to evaluate the moral weight of intentional versus non-intentional actions. By examining specific medical case studies, he constructs an argument that prioritizes the quality of life over the mere biological state of being alive.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts frequently cite this text as a foundational contribution to modern bioethical discourse. Readers often note the clarity and logical density of the prose, which makes complex philosophical arguments accessible to both students and practitioners.
Page Count:
224
Publication Date:
1986-11-20
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0192860704
ISBN-13:
9780192860705
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!